The President's Casual Remarks regarding Journalist's Murder Represents a Disturbing Development.
“Incidents take place.” Just two words. That’s all it took for the US president to brush off what is arguably the most notorious journalist killing of the last decade – and in so doing plumbed a new low in his contempt for journalists, for journalism – and for the truth.
The Context
The US president’s dismissal of the killing of well-known reporter Jamal Khashoggi came during a press conference with the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman – a man whom the CIA concluded in a 2021 report had ordered the abduction and murder of the journalist in 2018. (The crown prince has denied involvement.)
The American spy agencies were not the only ones to determine the homicide – which took place in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul and in which the late journalist was drugged and cut apart – was signed off at the highest levels. An inquiry led by then UN special rapporteur, Agnès Callamard, reached similar conclusions.
Global Reactions
For a short time, nations were in agreement in their criticism of the kingdom’s conduct. The United States enacted sanctions and travel restrictions in 2021 over the murder, although it stopped short of sanctioning Prince Mohammed himself. Since then, the kingdom has been slowly rehabilitating itself – and the crown prince’s visit to Washington seemed to be the ultimate sign of that redemption.
Presidential Comments
Critics of the government had roundly condemned the meeting. But what was evident at the presidential residence was more alarming than could have been imagined. Not only did the president honor Prince Mohammed but he effectively rewrote history – and then blamed the victim. The crown prince, Trump claimed when asked, was unaware about the murder – in clear opposition to what his nation’s intelligence services determined four years ago. Moreover, the president said: “Many individuals didn’t like that person that you’re talking about, whether you approve of him or disapproved, incidents occur.”
Established Conduct
This represents a new and abject low for a leader who has made no attempt to hide of his contempt for the truth – or for the media. Trump has defamed journalists (he called ABC news, whose journalist asked the inquiry about the journalist at the media event “fake news”), scolded them in open settings (he called one a “piggy” this week for asking about his relationship with the convicted sex offender financier Jeffrey Epstein), taken legal action against media organizations for eye-watering sums of money in vexatious law suits, and called for news outlets he disapproves of to lose their licenses.
He has pressured veteran news services out of the official briefing group for refusing to use terminology of his choosing, and he has slashed funding for essential public media at domestically and crucial free press internationally.
Broader Implications
All of that has fostered an environment in which reporters are clearly more vulnerable in the United States, but one in which their victimization – and indeed killing – becomes not just insignificant (“things happen”) but tolerated (“a lot of people didn’t like that gentleman”).
It is no surprise that that year was the most lethal year on record for the press in the more than 30 years the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has been documenting this data: a persistent failure to hold those responsible for reporter murders has created a culture of impunity in which journalists’ killers are literally able to escape punishment and so persist in these actions.
In no place is this clearer than in the Middle Eastern nation, which is accountable for the deaths of over two hundred journalists in the past two years.
Effect on Society
The impact on the public is profound. Attacks on journalists are attacks on the truth. They are attacks on facts. They are attacks on our entitlement to information and on our freedom to exist without fear and securely.
On Thursday, the Committee to Protect Journalists gathers for its annual global journalism honors. My message there is the identical as my message for Trump: these things may happen. But it is our responsibility to make sure they do not.