🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare it to what average American pays. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.