🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.